With a massive population and religious culture rooted in vegetarianism, India’s alternative protein industry has been developing at unprecedented speeds. At the same time, we have seen the local government grant funding to promote the research and development of cellular agriculture and introduce some regulatory changes that may indirectly impact alternative proteins.

At present, India has not formulated a food standard or new regulation for the food category of alternative protein products. However, we continue to see a trend where local authorities carry out strict labeling rules for the use of dairy terms in India. Specifically, the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 20111 explicitly prohibit the use of any dairy terms for a food that is not milk or a milk product. That being said, the nomenclature of certain products, e.g., coconut milk, despite referring to the term “milk,” remains permissible given the well-established perception by consumers of certain non-milk products. In late 2021, however, India ordered an investigation2 into the alleged use of dairy terms on the labels of plant-based beverages and food products, mostly being sold through e-commerce channels. The authority expressed concern that the use of such terms may mislead consumers. However, because India has not yet developed any guidance on the labeling of alternative proteins, e.g., plant-based meats, cell-based foods, and algal protein, the industry remains unclear about the appropriate nomenclature to use for alternative protein products. It remains to be seen whether India will allow for certain qualifiers, such as “plant-based,” “cell-based,” etc., to describe these products, similar to what has been permitted by some countries in other parts of the world. 

Oftentimes, vegan and alternative protein foods have overlapping aspects, so it is important to monitor the developments of vegan foods, as it may shed some light on what we can expect the authority to do in the alternative proteins space. For example, in September of 2021, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) published a draft standard for vegan foods3, under which vegan foods are newly defined as foods or food ingredients that have not made use of any ingredients, additives, and processing aids of animal origin (e.g., dairy products, fish, eggs). A major element of the draft was the creation of a new vegan logo specifically for vegan foods, and all vegan foods shall carry the logo on their package after the endorsement from the food authority upon application. The draft, once finalized, may also apply to plant-based alternative protein marketing in India, but this remains to be seen. 

While, again, there is not yet a regulatory pathway to clear new alternative proteins in India, such foods are likely to be regulated as “novel food” under the Food Safety and Standards (Health Supplements, Nutraceuticals, Food for Special Dietary Use, Food for Special Medical Purpose, Functional Food and Novel Food) Regulations, 2016,4 either because of no history of human consumption or because it may involve the use of new technologies. Novel foods are not allowed to be manufactured or sold in India without firstly being evaluated and approved by FSSAI. It should be noted that FSSAI has not established a regulatory pathway to clear food products of genetically modified (GM) origin or containing GM ingredients. However, FSSAI proposed a new draft regulation last year specifically for genetically modified or engineered foods,5 under which procedures for prior approval for the manufacture, storage, distribution, sale, and import of genetically modified food products, detailed testing, and labeling requirements are specified. Enterprises manufacturing GM-derived alternative proteins are encouraged to closely monitor the regulatory updates in this area.

Compendium_Food_Additives_Regulations_03_03_2022.pdf (fssai.gov.in)

6130a8a4e16a4Letter_Compliant_Milk_Diary_02_09_2021.pdf (fssai.gov.in)

Draft_Notiifcation_FSS_Vegan_Food_08_09_2021.pdf (fssai.gov.in)

Compendium_Nutra_29_09_2021.pdf (fssai.gov.in)

Draft_Notification_GM_Food_17_11_2021.pdf (fssai.gov.in)

David Ettinger joined Keller and Heckman in 1999. Mr. Ettinger represents domestic and foreign corporations in the area of food and drug law.

Mr. Ettinger relocated to Keller and Heckman's Shanghai office in November 2012 to focus on the Asian market and counsel companies in the Far East on food, drug, and chemical regulatory matters. He has extensive experience counseling clients on product development and product protection of food and drug packaging in the United States, Europe, Asia, Canada, and South America. From 2006-2007, Mr. Ettinger...

Jenny Li joined Keller and Heckman in October 2007.

Ms. Li counsels clients on regulatory issues focusing on food and drug, with an emphasis on regulatory regimes in the Asia-Pacific region. She also counsels clients on food labeling, food claims, food additives, as well as, important issues regarding food imports in Asian countries.

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.